Nueva versi

[ignacio]

Xevi,
Eso es normal. Los ficheros se incluyen en el proyecto tan sólo para poder
editarlos rapidamente, pero sigue siendo necesario indicar bien el path en
los comandos #include.
Un saludo
--
Ignacio Ortiz de Zúñiga
http://www.xailer.com
"Xevi" <xevicomas@gmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:[email=475681dd@ozsrv2.ozlan.local...]475681dd@ozsrv2.ozlan.local...[/email]
> Si incluyo un .CH en el proyecto, que no está en la carpeta "Include",
> sinó que por alguna u otra razón lo tengo guardado en otra carpeta de otro
> proyecto, no lo tiene en cuenta y se queja diciendo que no existe el
> fichero al compilar.
>
> Un Saludo,
> Xevi.
>
> "Ignacio Ortiz de Zúñiga" <NoName@xailer.com> escribió en el mensaje de
> noticias news:475593d1$[email=1@ozsrv2.ozlan.local...]1@ozsrv2.ozlan.local...[/email]
>> Más información en el siguiente enlace: http://xailer.info/esp/?p=87
>> ------------------------------------------------------------ ------
>> Further information on this link: http://xailer.info/eng/?p=22
>>
>> http://www.xailer.com
>>
>>
>

[ignacio]

Xevi,
Ya respondido. Espero que tengamos una actualización hoy mismo.
Un saludo
--
Ignacio Ortiz de Zúñiga
http://www.xailer.com
"Xevi" <xevicomas@gmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:47568420$[email=1@ozsrv2.ozlan.local...]1@ozsrv2.ozlan.local...[/email]
> Si incluyo un Lib que está alojada en una carpeta que no sea la de Xailer
> o la de xHarbour, al enlazar no la encuentra y no puede compilar
> correctamente el proyecto.
>
> De momento añado Libs de terceros al estilo anterior.
>
> Un Saludo,
> Xevi.
>
> "Ignacio Ortiz de Zúñiga" <NoName@xailer.com> escribió en el mensaje de
> noticias news:475593d1$[email=1@ozsrv2.ozlan.local...]1@ozsrv2.ozlan.local...[/email]
>> Más información en el siguiente enlace: http://xailer.info/esp/?p=87
>> ------------------------------------------------------------ ------
>> Further information on this link: http://xailer.info/eng/?p=22
>>
>> http://www.xailer.com
>>
>>
>

[Mahanimann]

> Is correct. Please reread Xailer license.
Yes I found it there. But as most others I "never" read the usually very
boring license, so an activation counter is completely new to me. I can live
with it though, even if I think information like that is vital, important
and very much belongs in the product description, .AND./.OR. *at* *least*
somewhere in the order process. As it is now, you kind of hide in a single
file "nobody" usually reads.
Also, I'm disappointed with your sales departement (you know who I'm
thinking of), when we had some trouble when I bought my license I asked
especially if there where any other terms, conditions etc. I should be aware
of. She did not reply (to that question/request either).
But heck, even if I'm not at all impressed (to say it in a *very* kind way)
with your "sales departement", I'm extremely pleased with your "development
departement" and Xailer itself. Even a newbie like me gets productive in a
few days.
Best regards,
Paal

[ignacio]

Paal,
I am completely astonish by the fact you are surprised with Xailer
enterprise license. I believe is exactly the same as the 99,99% of any other
commercial software. One license gives you the INDIVIDUAL right to use the
software in one machine at a time. But we let you install the software on
three machines at the same time. This is a lot more than most other
commercial software give. In any case, if you do not like this conditions
contact our sales department to get your money refund.
BTW, I did not like at all your comment about hiding information, you are
completely wrong. You better be more cautious next time if you do not mind,
in case you want to continue with us.
Regards,
Ignacio Ortiz
"Mahanimann" <paaldalen@gmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:[email=4756f535@ozsrv2.ozlan.local...]4756f535@ozsrv2.ozlan.local...[/email]
>> Is correct. Please reread Xailer license.
>
> Yes I found it there. But as most others I "never" read the usually very
> boring license, so an activation counter is completely new to me. I can
> live with it though, even if I think information like that is vital,
> important and very much belongs in the product description, .AND./.OR.
> *at* *least* somewhere in the order process. As it is now, you kind of
> hide in a single file "nobody" usually reads.
>
> Also, I'm disappointed with your sales departement (you know who I'm
> thinking of), when we had some trouble when I bought my license I asked
> especially if there where any other terms, conditions etc. I should be
> aware of. She did not reply (to that question/request either).
>
> But heck, even if I'm not at all impressed (to say it in a *very* kind
> way) with your "sales departement", I'm extremely pleased with your
> "development departement" and Xailer itself. Even a newbie like me gets
> productive in a few days.
>
> Best regards,
> Paal
>

[Stephan Hennekens]

Hi Paal,
I have a completely different experience with the Xailer sales person. Also
I belief that such an accusation should not be placed on a public forum,
it's seems quite unfair to me.
Regards,
Stephan
"Mahanimann" <paaldalen@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:[email=4756f535@ozsrv2.ozlan.local...]4756f535@ozsrv2.ozlan.local...[/email]
>> Is correct. Please reread Xailer license.
>
> Yes I found it there. But as most others I "never" read the usually very
> boring license, so an activation counter is completely new to me. I can
> live with it though, even if I think information like that is vital,
> important and very much belongs in the product description, .AND./.OR.
> *at* *least* somewhere in the order process. As it is now, you kind of
> hide in a single file "nobody" usually reads.
>
> Also, I'm disappointed with your sales departement (you know who I'm
> thinking of), when we had some trouble when I bought my license I asked
> especially if there where any other terms, conditions etc. I should be
> aware of. She did not reply (to that question/request either).
>
> But heck, even if I'm not at all impressed (to say it in a *very* kind
> way) with your "sales departement", I'm extremely pleased with your
> "development departement" and Xailer itself. Even a newbie like me gets
> productive in a few days.
>
> Best regards,
> Paal
>

[Mahanimann]

> BTW, I did not like at all your comment about hiding information, you are
> completely wrong. You better be more cautious next time if you do not
> mind, in case you want to continue with us.
OOOPS!
Yes, you are right! When I re-read what I wrote I see that it's as stupid
as like I'm a village idiot. That was not my intension, I have no feelings
towards the license and your sales departement other than slightly
humoristic (in a positive way!). I had a smile on my face when I wrote it,
but I see that the clumsy text indicates the exact opposite.
Very, very thoughtless of me, and I'm very, very sorry.
Best regards
Paal

[Mahanimann]

> I have a completely different experience with the Xailer sales person.
> Also I belief that such an accusation should not be placed on a public
> forum, it's seems quite unfair to me.
Yes, of course you are right. The way I wrote that stuff was rude and plain
dumb. It was ment to be humoristic, but ended up like quite the opposite.
Please see what I answered Ignacio. (O'boy, this is very embarrassing!)
Best Regards,
Paal

[ignacio]

Paal,
Ok. Do not worry. Nothing happened.
Regards,
"Mahanimann" <paaldalen@gmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:4757fbef$[email=1@ozsrv2.ozlan.local...]1@ozsrv2.ozlan.local...[/email]
>> BTW, I did not like at all your comment about hiding information, you are
>> completely wrong. You better be more cautious next time if you do not
>> mind, in case you want to continue with us.
>
> OOOPS!
>
> Yes, you are right! When I re-read what I wrote I see that it's as stupid
> as like I'm a village idiot. That was not my intension, I have no
> feelings towards the license and your sales departement other than
> slightly humoristic (in a positive way!). I had a smile on my face when I
> wrote it, but I see that the clumsy text indicates the exact opposite.
>
> Very, very thoughtless of me, and I'm very, very sorry.
>
> Best regards
> Paal
>

[Mahanimann]

> Ok. Do not worry. Nothing happened.
That's good, but I'm still embarrassed (that's good too)
Paal